<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393478</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the adjustment on account of the difference in Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) due to customs duty variations, emphasizing the need for adjustments to ensure comparability. The ITAT affirmed the deletion of the adjustment for advertisement and business promotion expenses, following precedents establishing such expenses as revenue in nature. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 30.01.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:00:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393478</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the adjustment on account of the difference in Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) due to customs duty variations, emphasizing the need for adjustments to ensure comparability. The ITAT affirmed the deletion of the adjustment for advertisement and business promotion expenses, following precedents establishing such expenses as revenue in nature. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 30.01.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>