<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 619 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393475</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal, ruling that interest income from deposits with commercial and co-operative banks does not qualify for deductions under Sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d). However, the ITAT allowed the claim for pro rata expenses related to interest income from commercial banks, subject to verification by the assessing officer. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:15:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 619 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393475</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal, ruling that interest income from deposits with commercial and co-operative banks does not qualify for deductions under Sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d). However, the ITAT allowed the claim for pro rata expenses related to interest income from commercial banks, subject to verification by the assessing officer. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>