<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1751 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, remanding the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustment issues for fresh adjudication and affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on expense treatment and NICNET charges. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to review the ALP adjustments in line with legal and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:14:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1751 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, remanding the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustment issues for fresh adjudication and affirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on expense treatment and NICNET charges. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to review the ALP adjustments in line with legal and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>