<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1683 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286825</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the alleged short deduction of TDS. It emphasized the acceptance of the short deduction, citing settled legal positions and the availability of multiple views for the Assessing Officer. The Court found no grounds for interference and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that no substantial questions of law arose for determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1683 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286825</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the alleged short deduction of TDS. It emphasized the acceptance of the short deduction, citing settled legal positions and the availability of multiple views for the Assessing Officer. The Court found no grounds for interference and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that no substantial questions of law arose for determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>