<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trading of goods by manufacturer after availing cenvat credit and issuance of cenvatable invoices</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116147</link>
    <description>Manufacturer cannot claim Cenvat Credit on spare parts that were purchased and cleared as traded goods because such inputs were not used in or in relation to manufacture of the dutiable final product. Issuance of cenvatable invoices for those spare parts is invalid unless the seller is registered and authorised as a dealer in excisable goods; credits erroneously availed should be reversed with interest. Where service tax on reverse charge was paid under a different legal entity/PAN, credit cannot be claimed by the manufacturer unless the same legal entity made the payment; such PAN/registration mismatches are procedural lapses if no revenue loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:06:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trading of goods by manufacturer after availing cenvat credit and issuance of cenvatable invoices</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116147</link>
      <description>Manufacturer cannot claim Cenvat Credit on spare parts that were purchased and cleared as traded goods because such inputs were not used in or in relation to manufacture of the dutiable final product. Issuance of cenvatable invoices for those spare parts is invalid unless the seller is registered and authorised as a dealer in excisable goods; credits erroneously availed should be reversed with interest. Where service tax on reverse charge was paid under a different legal entity/PAN, credit cannot be claimed by the manufacturer unless the same legal entity made the payment; such PAN/registration mismatches are procedural lapses if no revenue loss.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:06:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>