https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286816 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the tender process, upholding the grouping of airports and eligibility criteria as reasonable. It found no evidence of mala fides or favoritism, emphasizing the rationality of the decision-making process. Judicial review in contractual matters was limited to arbitrariness and mala fides, with the court concluding that the commercial considerations behind the tender conditions did not warrant interference. The court highlighted the importance of fairness and non-arbitrariness in state actions, ultimately affirming the validity of the tender process. en-us Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:21:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286816 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the tender process, upholding the grouping of airports and eligibility criteria as reasonable. It found no evidence of mala fides or favoritism, emphasizing the rationality of the decision-making process. Judicial review in contractual matters was limited to arbitrariness and mala fides, with the court concluding that the commercial considerations behind the tender conditions did not warrant interference. The court highlighted the importance of fairness and non-arbitrariness in state actions, ultimately affirming the validity of the tender process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286816