<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 6 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21702</link>
    <description>The court held that interest under sections 139(8) and 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not payable in reassessment cases due to the effacement of the original assessment upon reopening. The appellants&#039; contention that interest should be paid based on the original assessment was deemed untenable. The court affirmed the single judge&#039;s order, dismissing the appeals and clarifying the liability of interest in reassessment cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 6 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21702</link>
      <description>The court held that interest under sections 139(8) and 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not payable in reassessment cases due to the effacement of the original assessment upon reopening. The appellants&#039; contention that interest should be paid based on the original assessment was deemed untenable. The court affirmed the single judge&#039;s order, dismissing the appeals and clarifying the liability of interest in reassessment cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>