<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 243 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286808</link>
    <description>Rental income from part of a co-operative bank&#039;s own building was treated as connected with the banking business because the letting was incidental to business use, and the head of income did not control its real character; on that basis, the receipt was regarded as capable of exemption under section 80P. The analysis also notes that &quot;attributable to&quot; is wider than &quot;derived from&quot; and that a bank may maintain buildings necessary or convenient for its business under the Banking Regulation Act. By contrast, dividend income from investments in Industrial Finance Corporation Ltd. was held to be a separate receipt not linked to the banking business and therefore not eligible for the claimed exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 243 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286808</link>
      <description>Rental income from part of a co-operative bank&#039;s own building was treated as connected with the banking business because the letting was incidental to business use, and the head of income did not control its real character; on that basis, the receipt was regarded as capable of exemption under section 80P. The analysis also notes that &quot;attributable to&quot; is wider than &quot;derived from&quot; and that a bank may maintain buildings necessary or convenient for its business under the Banking Regulation Act. By contrast, dividend income from investments in Industrial Finance Corporation Ltd. was held to be a separate receipt not linked to the banking business and therefore not eligible for the claimed exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>