<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>REVOCATION OF EARLIER DETENTION ORDER DOES NOT IPSO FACTO BARS PASSING THE FRESH DETENTION ORDER AGAINST THE DETENU.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8997</link>
    <description>Revocation of an earlier detention order does not ipso facto bar a fresh detention order where the detaining authority has applied its mind and the grounds show awareness that the detenu is in custody, satisfaction that he is likely to be released, and subjective satisfaction that release would likely lead to prejudicial activities, making detention necessary to prevent recurrence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:08:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:08:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>REVOCATION OF EARLIER DETENTION ORDER DOES NOT IPSO FACTO BARS PASSING THE FRESH DETENTION ORDER AGAINST THE DETENU.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8997</link>
      <description>Revocation of an earlier detention order does not ipso facto bar a fresh detention order where the detaining authority has applied its mind and the grounds show awareness that the detenu is in custody, satisfaction that he is likely to be released, and subjective satisfaction that release would likely lead to prejudicial activities, making detention necessary to prevent recurrence.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:08:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>