<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21698</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s request under Section 226(4) of the Act. It held that the amount allowed to be withdrawn without security belonged to the petitioner and could be appropriated by the Income-tax Department. The amount requiring security would only belong to the petitioner after furnishing security. The court ruled in favor of the Income-tax Department, dismissing the petition with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21698</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the validity of the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s request under Section 226(4) of the Act. It held that the amount allowed to be withdrawn without security belonged to the petitioner and could be appropriated by the Income-tax Department. The amount requiring security would only belong to the petitioner after furnishing security. The court ruled in favor of the Income-tax Department, dismissing the petition with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>