https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393458 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. It held that the rental and amenities income should not be entirely treated as the appellant's income, validating agreements with family members. The lease agreement with family members was deemed valid, and the rental income offered by them should not be taxed again in the appellant's hands. Amenities charges were classified as Income from House Property, not Other Sources. The tribunal recognized the risk of double taxation and directed the AO to recompute income, allowing statutory deductions under Income from House Property. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Mar 2020 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393458 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. It held that the rental and amenities income should not be entirely treated as the appellant's income, validating agreements with family members. The lease agreement with family members was deemed valid, and the rental income offered by them should not be taxed again in the appellant's hands. Amenities charges were classified as Income from House Property, not Other Sources. The tribunal recognized the risk of double taxation and directed the AO to recompute income, allowing statutory deductions under Income from House Property. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393458