<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 600 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Ld. CIT(Appeals), dismissing both appeals. The assessee was granted deduction for 48 out of 60 flats, and the inclusion of the D.P. Road area in the plot size was accepted for eligibility under Section 80IB(10). Emphasis was placed on the necessity of obtaining a completion certificate from the relevant authority as a fundamental requirement for claiming the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 600 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Ld. CIT(Appeals), dismissing both appeals. The assessee was granted deduction for 48 out of 60 flats, and the inclusion of the D.P. Road area in the plot size was accepted for eligibility under Section 80IB(10). Emphasis was placed on the necessity of obtaining a completion certificate from the relevant authority as a fundamental requirement for claiming the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>