<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 599 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393455</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 due to lack of specificity in the notice regarding the basis for penalty initiation. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing the necessity of clearly indicating the grounds for penalty, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty amount of Rs. 5,36,115. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was revoked in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 599 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393455</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 due to lack of specificity in the notice regarding the basis for penalty initiation. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing the necessity of clearly indicating the grounds for penalty, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty amount of Rs. 5,36,115. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalty was revoked in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>