<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 594 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393450</link>
    <description>Additions for undisclosed stock investment and profit on alleged clandestine sales cannot be sustained when they rest entirely on excise findings that no longer survive. The income-tax assessments were based on the excise department&#039;s allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of finished goods, but the excise demand underpinning that basis was set aside by CESTAT. Once that foundation was removed, the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimations lost support and could not stand. The same reasoning applied to the second assessment year, which involved identical facts. The additions were therefore deleted on the common issue for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 594 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393450</link>
      <description>Additions for undisclosed stock investment and profit on alleged clandestine sales cannot be sustained when they rest entirely on excise findings that no longer survive. The income-tax assessments were based on the excise department&#039;s allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of finished goods, but the excise demand underpinning that basis was set aside by CESTAT. Once that foundation was removed, the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimations lost support and could not stand. The same reasoning applied to the second assessment year, which involved identical facts. The additions were therefore deleted on the common issue for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>