<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 579 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393435</link>
    <description>The Government rejected the Revision Application, upholding the penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, for attempting to smuggle prohibited gold bars and evade customs duties. The judgment affirmed the seriousness of the offense, leading to the confiscation of the goods and imposition of the appropriate penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 579 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393435</link>
      <description>The Government rejected the Revision Application, upholding the penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, for attempting to smuggle prohibited gold bars and evade customs duties. The judgment affirmed the seriousness of the offense, leading to the confiscation of the goods and imposition of the appropriate penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>