<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 568 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393424</link>
    <description>A land allotment and development arrangement that pooled investor contributions, used the funds for acquisition and development, promised returns through allotment or appreciation, and left investors without day-to-day control satisfied the indicia of a collective investment scheme. Carrying on that scheme without registration violated the securities law framework and amounted to unauthorised fund mobilisation treated as fraudulent and unfair trade practice; the directors were also held responsible for the company&#039;s violations. In consequence, winding-up, refund, disclosure, market restraint, debarment and asset and repayment reporting directions were issued to protect investors and secure compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:48:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 568 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393424</link>
      <description>A land allotment and development arrangement that pooled investor contributions, used the funds for acquisition and development, promised returns through allotment or appreciation, and left investors without day-to-day control satisfied the indicia of a collective investment scheme. Carrying on that scheme without registration violated the securities law framework and amounted to unauthorised fund mobilisation treated as fraudulent and unfair trade practice; the directors were also held responsible for the company&#039;s violations. In consequence, winding-up, refund, disclosure, market restraint, debarment and asset and repayment reporting directions were issued to protect investors and secure compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>