<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1257 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286803</link>
    <description>Appeal maintainability was tested against CBDT monetary-limit circulars, and the court accepted that the appeal was incompetent because the departmental threshold was not met. As no exception or merits-based adjudication was undertaken, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable and the pending interlocutory application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:45:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1257 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286803</link>
      <description>Appeal maintainability was tested against CBDT monetary-limit circulars, and the court accepted that the appeal was incompetent because the departmental threshold was not met. As no exception or merits-based adjudication was undertaken, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable and the pending interlocutory application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>