<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1572 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction U/s.54 for the assessee despite the failure to deposit residue sale proceeds in the capital gains scheme account within the stipulated period. The Tribunal emphasized the beneficial interpretation of tax provisions to favor the assessee and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents supporting the assessee in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1572 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction U/s.54 for the assessee despite the failure to deposit residue sale proceeds in the capital gains scheme account within the stipulated period. The Tribunal emphasized the beneficial interpretation of tax provisions to favor the assessee and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents supporting the assessee in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>