<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1817 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2011-12 and 2012-13, directing the inclusion and exclusion of specific comparables to ensure the transactions were at arm&#039;s length. The revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 was dismissed based on the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were guided by previous case law and functional similarity in selecting comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1817 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2011-12 and 2012-13, directing the inclusion and exclusion of specific comparables to ensure the transactions were at arm&#039;s length. The revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 was dismissed based on the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were guided by previous case law and functional similarity in selecting comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>