<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1769 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to include Cyber Media Research Ltd. as a comparable for determining the arm&#039;s length price, citing functional similarity. Ladder-up Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. was deemed not comparable due to its distinct functional profile. Motilal Oswal Private Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd. was also excluded as comparable for its diverse business activities. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Ltd. as it engaged in different services. The DRP&#039;s decision to allow the bonus payment to shareholder directors was upheld, referencing previous tribunal and court decisions. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2020 09:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1769 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to include Cyber Media Research Ltd. as a comparable for determining the arm&#039;s length price, citing functional similarity. Ladder-up Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. was deemed not comparable due to its distinct functional profile. Motilal Oswal Private Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd. was also excluded as comparable for its diverse business activities. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Ltd. as it engaged in different services. The DRP&#039;s decision to allow the bonus payment to shareholder directors was upheld, referencing previous tribunal and court decisions. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>