https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286792 The Tribunal treated Regulation 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules and the inherent power recognised in section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure as permitting further orders to give effect to its earlier decision and secure justice. On that basis, it modified the prior final order because subsequent developments and the hardship from denial of renewal justified reconsideration. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Jodhpur, for fresh examination of the Customs House Agent licence renewal request in accordance with law after hearing the appellant. en-us Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Mar 2020 09:36:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286792 The Tribunal treated Regulation 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules and the inherent power recognised in section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure as permitting further orders to give effect to its earlier decision and secure justice. On that basis, it modified the prior final order because subsequent developments and the hardship from denial of renewal justified reconsideration. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Jodhpur, for fresh examination of the Customs House Agent licence renewal request in accordance with law after hearing the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286792