https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393415 The court addressed the concerns raised in the writ-application regarding the validity of the notice for confiscation under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It directed the respondent to clarify the alleged contravention specified in the notice and the proper recipient of the notice. Additionally, the court allowed the writ-applicants to file for the provisional release of the goods and vehicle under Section 67(6) of the Act, with instructions for prompt review and issuance of an appropriate order. The court did not provide a specific ruling on the legality of Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST or the awarding of costs to the petitioner. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393415 The court addressed the concerns raised in the writ-application regarding the validity of the notice for confiscation under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It directed the respondent to clarify the alleged contravention specified in the notice and the proper recipient of the notice. Additionally, the court allowed the writ-applicants to file for the provisional release of the goods and vehicle under Section 67(6) of the Act, with instructions for prompt review and issuance of an appropriate order. The court did not provide a specific ruling on the legality of Circular No. 41/15/2018-GST or the awarding of costs to the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393415