https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393413 The case involved determining whether the reduction in the GST rate on the product "Bajaj Majesty MX 20 Steam Iron" from 28% to 18% was passed on to consumers as required by law. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) found no evidence of profiteering as the base price remained unchanged post the rate reduction, and price increases were in line with the Respondent's business practices. The application alleging violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 was dismissed, and the parties were informed accordingly. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393413 The case involved determining whether the reduction in the GST rate on the product "Bajaj Majesty MX 20 Steam Iron" from 28% to 18% was passed on to consumers as required by law. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) found no evidence of profiteering as the base price remained unchanged post the rate reduction, and price increases were in line with the Respondent's business practices. The application alleging violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 was dismissed, and the parties were informed accordingly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393413