<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 553 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the assessing officer&#039;s decision to disallow the remuneration paid to the Director under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the Director&#039;s role and past allowance of salary payments, finding his explanation reasonable. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Director&#039;s remuneration for consultation and advisory services, stating that expenses for business purposes could be claimed as deductions. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of remuneration under Section 153-A, noting the Director&#039;s role and lack of evidence against payment. Furthermore, it upheld the reliance on DRI&#039;s findings and considered the impact of CESTAT&#039;s order on the assessment pending before the High Court of Gujarat.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 553 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the assessing officer&#039;s decision to disallow the remuneration paid to the Director under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the Director&#039;s role and past allowance of salary payments, finding his explanation reasonable. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Director&#039;s remuneration for consultation and advisory services, stating that expenses for business purposes could be claimed as deductions. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of remuneration under Section 153-A, noting the Director&#039;s role and lack of evidence against payment. Furthermore, it upheld the reliance on DRI&#039;s findings and considered the impact of CESTAT&#039;s order on the assessment pending before the High Court of Gujarat.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>