https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393406 The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's request to condone the delay in submitting Form 3CK in physical form and grant approval for the financial year 2017-18. The petitioner was given the opportunity to make a representation to the respondent, emphasizing that the absence of a provision for condoning such delay should not be a ground for rejection, given the non-functioning of the respondent's portal during the submission period. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:20:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393406 The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's request to condone the delay in submitting Form 3CK in physical form and grant approval for the financial year 2017-18. The petitioner was given the opportunity to make a representation to the respondent, emphasizing that the absence of a provision for condoning such delay should not be a ground for rejection, given the non-functioning of the respondent's portal during the submission period. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393406