<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 539 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393395</link>
    <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the appellant&#039;s genuine ignorance and reliance on inexperienced representation. The addition of Rs. 9,00,000/- as unexplained income was deleted as the tribunal found the explanation regarding the source of cash deposit reasonable, supported by evidence of compensation received from RIICO. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 03/03/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:20:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 539 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393395</link>
      <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the appellant&#039;s genuine ignorance and reliance on inexperienced representation. The addition of Rs. 9,00,000/- as unexplained income was deleted as the tribunal found the explanation regarding the source of cash deposit reasonable, supported by evidence of compensation received from RIICO. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 03/03/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>