https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393385 The Supreme Court held that extending an anti-dumping duty beyond the expiry of the original notification was impermissible. The appellant's challenge to the demand for duty based on an extended notification after the original had expired was upheld. The Court emphasized that once the original notification ceased to exist, any extension thereof was invalid. The appeal was allowed, and the imposition of anti-dumping duty post-expiry was deemed unsustainable. en-us Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:06:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393385 The Supreme Court held that extending an anti-dumping duty beyond the expiry of the original notification was impermissible. The appellant's challenge to the demand for duty based on an extended notification after the original had expired was upheld. The Court emphasized that once the original notification ceased to exist, any extension thereof was invalid. The appeal was allowed, and the imposition of anti-dumping duty post-expiry was deemed unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393385