https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286761 Concessional duty under Notification No. 72/2005 was found available for imported goods of Heading 6907 under the Bangkok Agreement, because the exemption conditions were treated as satisfied. The Revenue's objection that the supplier used semi-finished tiles imported from China did not dislodge the prior remand finding that the notification continued to apply. The alleged anti-dumping aspect was not raised in the grounds of appeal and was therefore not examined. The order granting concessional relief was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:12:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286761 Concessional duty under Notification No. 72/2005 was found available for imported goods of Heading 6907 under the Bangkok Agreement, because the exemption conditions were treated as satisfied. The Revenue's objection that the supplier used semi-finished tiles imported from China did not dislodge the prior remand finding that the notification continued to apply. The alleged anti-dumping aspect was not raised in the grounds of appeal and was therefore not examined. The order granting concessional relief was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286761