https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393368 The Delhi High Court examined whether the computation method used to determine the profiteered amount in an anti-profiteering order required further consideration. On a prima facie assessment, it found the adopted method warranted examination, particularly as the impugned order followed the same basis as an earlier order concerning the same petitioner but different goods. Pending further hearing, the Court stayed the operation of the impugned order and restrained the respondents from initiating penalty proceedings against the petitioner. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393368 The Delhi High Court examined whether the computation method used to determine the profiteered amount in an anti-profiteering order required further consideration. On a prima facie assessment, it found the adopted method warranted examination, particularly as the impugned order followed the same basis as an earlier order concerning the same petitioner but different goods. Pending further hearing, the Court stayed the operation of the impugned order and restrained the respondents from initiating penalty proceedings against the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393368