<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 498 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393354</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 105(a) of the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) for the financial year 2006-07. The Court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard before imposing penalties and clarified the conditions under which relief from penalty can be granted under Sections 105 and 108 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:12:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 498 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393354</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 105(a) of the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) for the financial year 2006-07. The Court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard before imposing penalties and clarified the conditions under which relief from penalty can be granted under Sections 105 and 108 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>