<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1870 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of Rs. 62,935 for travelling expenses of family members of players. However, the appeal succeeded in overturning the disallowance of Rs. 60,87,867 for hospitality expenses on an adhoc basis, based on a precedent set in the assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1870 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of Rs. 62,935 for travelling expenses of family members of players. However, the appeal succeeded in overturning the disallowance of Rs. 60,87,867 for hospitality expenses on an adhoc basis, based on a precedent set in the assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>