<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21671</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that interest under section 216 of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the assessee had filed a statement under section 209A(1)(a) without the need to estimate income. The Court emphasized the distinction between a statement and an estimate, highlighting that interest is attracted only when an estimate is found to be an underestimate compared to subsequent estimates. The judgment favored interpreting provisions in favor of the taxpayer, particularly in cases involving penal interest, and answered the reference question affirmatively in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21671</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that interest under section 216 of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the assessee had filed a statement under section 209A(1)(a) without the need to estimate income. The Court emphasized the distinction between a statement and an estimate, highlighting that interest is attracted only when an estimate is found to be an underestimate compared to subsequent estimates. The judgment favored interpreting provisions in favor of the taxpayer, particularly in cases involving penal interest, and answered the reference question affirmatively in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>