<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21670</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the allowance of interest on arrears of commission and the classification of the drainage system for depreciation purposes. It held that overhead water tanks should be considered part of the building for depreciation. However, the court sided with the Department on the inclusion of borrowed capital for relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:16:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21670</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the allowance of interest on arrears of commission and the classification of the drainage system for depreciation purposes. It held that overhead water tanks should be considered part of the building for depreciation. However, the court sided with the Department on the inclusion of borrowed capital for relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>