<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 486 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393342</link>
    <description>Section 14 moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects telecom licences and spectrum where they are integral to the corporate debtor&#039;s business and necessary for CIRP. The licence and spectrum were treated as essential to uninterrupted operations and enterprise value, so their use could not be disrupted during insolvency proceedings. Although spectrum remained a State asset and the debtor held only a right to use it, that limited interest did not justify cancellation or interference that would frustrate the statutory moratorium and resolution process. The Department of Telecommunications was therefore restrained from suspending or cancelling the licence during moratorium.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 486 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393342</link>
      <description>Section 14 moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects telecom licences and spectrum where they are integral to the corporate debtor&#039;s business and necessary for CIRP. The licence and spectrum were treated as essential to uninterrupted operations and enterprise value, so their use could not be disrupted during insolvency proceedings. Although spectrum remained a State asset and the debtor held only a right to use it, that limited interest did not justify cancellation or interference that would frustrate the statutory moratorium and resolution process. The Department of Telecommunications was therefore restrained from suspending or cancelling the licence during moratorium.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>