<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the duty paid under provisional assessment is not merely a deposit but legitimate duty under Section 18 of the Customs Act, allowing for CENVAT credit. Precedent cases supported the admissibility of such credit even if duties were later found excessive. The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to CENVAT credit on provisionally assessed duties, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the duty paid under provisional assessment is not merely a deposit but legitimate duty under Section 18 of the Customs Act, allowing for CENVAT credit. Precedent cases supported the admissibility of such credit even if duties were later found excessive. The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to CENVAT credit on provisionally assessed duties, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>