<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1252 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and partly allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue. It upheld the addition of Rs. 55 lakhs towards unexplained cash credits under section 68, finding the explanations lacking documentary evidence. Regarding the adoption of guidance value for the sale of property under section 50C, the Tribunal directed the AO to compute profits based on the actual sale consideration, disagreeing with the higher value adopted by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:49:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1252 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and partly allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue. It upheld the addition of Rs. 55 lakhs towards unexplained cash credits under section 68, finding the explanations lacking documentary evidence. Regarding the adoption of guidance value for the sale of property under section 50C, the Tribunal directed the AO to compute profits based on the actual sale consideration, disagreeing with the higher value adopted by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>