https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286718 A compromise decree carries judicial imprimatur and cannot be set aside on vague or general allegations of undue influence. A party seeking such relief must plead full particulars and disclose material showing that the compromise was not voluntary or lawful. Here, the applicant had earlier executed a registered relinquishment deed, lacked subsisting title when the suit was filed, personally supported the compromise in court, and later relied on the decree in other proceedings. Those facts, taken with the deficient pleadings, did not raise a disputed question requiring trial or evidence, so the application was rightly rejected without recording evidence. en-us Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:47:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286718 A compromise decree carries judicial imprimatur and cannot be set aside on vague or general allegations of undue influence. A party seeking such relief must plead full particulars and disclose material showing that the compromise was not voluntary or lawful. Here, the applicant had earlier executed a registered relinquishment deed, lacked subsisting title when the suit was filed, personally supported the compromise in court, and later relied on the decree in other proceedings. Those facts, taken with the deficient pleadings, did not raise a disputed question requiring trial or evidence, so the application was rightly rejected without recording evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286718