<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1275 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286718</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the compromise decree as valid and lawful. Allegations of undue influence and fraud were not substantiated, with the court emphasizing the importance of honoring court-approved compromises. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1275 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286718</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the compromise decree as valid and lawful. Allegations of undue influence and fraud were not substantiated, with the court emphasizing the importance of honoring court-approved compromises. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>