https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286716 A compromise eviction decree under rent control law is not a nullity merely because of alleged recording errors; it remains executable unless the court lacked inherent jurisdiction. A lawful compromise may sustain eviction where the record shows sufficient express or implied admissions of statutory grounds, and Order 23 Rule 3 CPC can apply to such suits if the compromise is not unlawful. Comparative hardship under the Bombay Rent Act is not a pleading requirement in the plaint; it is considered when the statutory eviction ground is otherwise established. The executing court cannot reopen the merits or take fresh evidence to defeat a valid compromise decree. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:27:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286716 A compromise eviction decree under rent control law is not a nullity merely because of alleged recording errors; it remains executable unless the court lacked inherent jurisdiction. A lawful compromise may sustain eviction where the record shows sufficient express or implied admissions of statutory grounds, and Order 23 Rule 3 CPC can apply to such suits if the compromise is not unlawful. Comparative hardship under the Bombay Rent Act is not a pleading requirement in the plaint; it is considered when the statutory eviction ground is otherwise established. The executing court cannot reopen the merits or take fresh evidence to defeat a valid compromise decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286716