<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, as the revised returns were filed voluntarily before any detection of concealment by the Department. The Tribunal emphasized the burden on the Department to prove concealment with positive evidence, which was lacking in these cases. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1253 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, as the revised returns were filed voluntarily before any detection of concealment by the Department. The Tribunal emphasized the burden on the Department to prove concealment with positive evidence, which was lacking in these cases. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>