<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 472 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393328</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the land sold by the assessee was agricultural and not a capital asset, thus exempt from tax. The Court emphasized the conjunctive reading of the conditions under Section 2(14)(iii)(a) and upheld the factual findings regarding the population and municipal jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 472 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393328</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the land sold by the assessee was agricultural and not a capital asset, thus exempt from tax. The Court emphasized the conjunctive reading of the conditions under Section 2(14)(iii)(a) and upheld the factual findings regarding the population and municipal jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>