<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 472 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393328</link>
    <description>Agricultural land is excluded from the definition of capital asset only where the statutory conditions are read conjunctively: the land must be outside municipal or cantonment jurisdiction and the population criterion must also be satisfied. The text states that the village entered municipal corporation limits on 03.07.2009, but the decisive factual finding was that its population was 5,912, below the statutory threshold. On that basis, the land continued to qualify as agricultural land and was not treated as a capital asset under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 472 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393328</link>
      <description>Agricultural land is excluded from the definition of capital asset only where the statutory conditions are read conjunctively: the land must be outside municipal or cantonment jurisdiction and the population criterion must also be satisfied. The text states that the village entered municipal corporation limits on 03.07.2009, but the decisive factual finding was that its population was 5,912, below the statutory threshold. On that basis, the land continued to qualify as agricultural land and was not treated as a capital asset under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>