<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 457 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified hire charges for transponders as Business Support Services, subjecting them to service tax. The show-cause notice was deemed time-barred, as no intent to evade tax was proven. Despite the tax liability, CENVAT credit ensured revenue neutrality. Penalties and interest were waived due to the lack of fraudulent intent. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for service tax, penalty, and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 457 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified hire charges for transponders as Business Support Services, subjecting them to service tax. The show-cause notice was deemed time-barred, as no intent to evade tax was proven. Despite the tax liability, CENVAT credit ensured revenue neutrality. Penalties and interest were waived due to the lack of fraudulent intent. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for service tax, penalty, and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>