<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 456 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393312</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling them non-maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court determined that issues of excisability and taxability fall under the SC&#039;s jurisdiction per Section 35L, particularly post the Finance Act, 2014 amendment. The Tribunal had earlier affirmed the assessee&#039;s activities as &quot;deemed manufacture,&quot; allowing CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 456 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393312</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling them non-maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court determined that issues of excisability and taxability fall under the SC&#039;s jurisdiction per Section 35L, particularly post the Finance Act, 2014 amendment. The Tribunal had earlier affirmed the assessee&#039;s activities as &quot;deemed manufacture,&quot; allowing CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>