<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 453 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393309</link>
    <description>Filing of a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 evidences full and final settlement of legacy central excise dues under the scheme. Once the SVLDRS-4 certificate is issued by the competent authority, the pending appeal before CESTAT ceases to survive and is treated as withdrawn. The operative effect is that the dispute is concluded under the settlement framework rather than pursued on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 453 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393309</link>
      <description>Filing of a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 evidences full and final settlement of legacy central excise dues under the scheme. Once the SVLDRS-4 certificate is issued by the competent authority, the pending appeal before CESTAT ceases to survive and is treated as withdrawn. The operative effect is that the dispute is concluded under the settlement framework rather than pursued on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>