<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1322 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286705</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the criminal appeal, setting aside the impugned order of dismissal and acquittal. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings as the accused had not appeared in the matter, and the dismissal under section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was premature. The trial court was directed to proceed if the appellant appeared; otherwise, appropriate orders were to be passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1322 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286705</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the criminal appeal, setting aside the impugned order of dismissal and acquittal. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings as the accused had not appeared in the matter, and the dismissal under section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was premature. The trial court was directed to proceed if the appellant appeared; otherwise, appropriate orders were to be passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>