<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1811 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It found that the AO failed to provide concrete evidence justifying the rejection of the books of accounts. The CIT(A) correctly deleted the additions made by the AO, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles. The AO&#039;s actions were deemed unjustified, being based on assumptions without proper consideration of the evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1811 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It found that the AO failed to provide concrete evidence justifying the rejection of the books of accounts. The CIT(A) correctly deleted the additions made by the AO, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles. The AO&#039;s actions were deemed unjustified, being based on assumptions without proper consideration of the evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>