<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21653</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the taxation of an Association of Persons under the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81. However, for the valuation method of unquoted shares for the assessment years 1981-82 to 1983-84, the court sided with the Revenue, holding that rule 1D is mandatory for valuing unquoted equity shares of non-investment companies, regardless of their status as going concerns or ripe for liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21653</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the taxation of an Association of Persons under the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81. However, for the valuation method of unquoted shares for the assessment years 1981-82 to 1983-84, the court sided with the Revenue, holding that rule 1D is mandatory for valuing unquoted equity shares of non-investment companies, regardless of their status as going concerns or ripe for liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>