<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 443 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393299</link>
    <description>The Authority rejected the Applicant&#039;s application under the CGST Act, citing that the classification question had already been decided by the Department. The ruling stands unless voided under relevant GST Act provisions, emphasizing the significance of consistency in assessment and compliance with legal provisions in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 443 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393299</link>
      <description>The Authority rejected the Applicant&#039;s application under the CGST Act, citing that the classification question had already been decided by the Department. The ruling stands unless voided under relevant GST Act provisions, emphasizing the significance of consistency in assessment and compliance with legal provisions in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>