<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 425 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Sovereign Ship Management Ltd, UK and Premier Ship Management Ltd, UK cannot be deemed associated enterprises (AEs) of the assessee under Section 92A(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, no adjustment to the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in respect of transactions with these entities was necessary. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and other grounds on the merits of the case were deemed academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 425 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Sovereign Ship Management Ltd, UK and Premier Ship Management Ltd, UK cannot be deemed associated enterprises (AEs) of the assessee under Section 92A(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, no adjustment to the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in respect of transactions with these entities was necessary. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and other grounds on the merits of the case were deemed academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>