https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286687 The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant's appeal by directing the authorities to exclude certain companies from the comparables and include others. Working capital adjustments were to be allowed on an actual basis. The Tribunal also noted errors in transfer pricing adjustments, rejection of documentation, comparability analysis, financial data consideration, service income and export earning filters, use of non-public information, and corporate tax adjustments. Interest under Section 234B was levied, which was deemed consequential to the additions in the assessment order. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286687 The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant's appeal by directing the authorities to exclude certain companies from the comparables and include others. Working capital adjustments were to be allowed on an actual basis. The Tribunal also noted errors in transfer pricing adjustments, rejection of documentation, comparability analysis, financial data consideration, service income and export earning filters, use of non-public information, and corporate tax adjustments. Interest under Section 234B was levied, which was deemed consequential to the additions in the assessment order. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286687