<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 413 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the relationship between the assessee and Kaybee Exim Pte Ltd was not that of associated enterprises under Section 92A of the Income Tax Act. As a result, no arm&#039;s length price adjustments were warranted for transactions between the entities, leading to the deletion of the impugned ALP adjustment. The decision focused on this key issue, making other legal and factual considerations moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 413 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the relationship between the assessee and Kaybee Exim Pte Ltd was not that of associated enterprises under Section 92A of the Income Tax Act. As a result, no arm&#039;s length price adjustments were warranted for transactions between the entities, leading to the deletion of the impugned ALP adjustment. The decision focused on this key issue, making other legal and factual considerations moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>